MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract C165: Breast cancer, statins, and 3-D cell culture.

2011· article· en· W2053411198 on OpenAlexaff
Peter Mullen, Carolyn A. Goard, Amanda R. Wasylishen, Aleksandra A. Pandyra, Linda Z. Penn

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Cancer Therapeutics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsToronto Public Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFluvastatinCell cultureCancerBreast cancerCancer researchCell growthCell cycleApoptosisCellStatinCancer cellMedicinePharmacologyChemistryBiologyInternal medicineBiochemistryGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Statins are widely used to lower serum cholesterol levels. They act by inhibiting hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR), the rate-limiting step in the mevalonate pathway. Recent work also shows that statins could be used as anticancer therapeutics, particularly in breast cancer. This study presents a preliminary rationale for the use of statins as a therapy in breast cancer. We characterized a panel of breast cancer cell lines for sensitivity to fluvastatin, using proliferation and cell-death assays. We also screened for differences in activity of the electron transport chain and glycolysis after fluvastatin treatment. We then began to expand on these results using 3D cell culture techniques to offer a more representative tumor model. The panel of breast cancer cell lines showed a range of sensitivity to fluvastatin, with MTT50 for 72 h treatment varying from 0.7 μM for MDA-MB231 cells to 162.8 μM in BT474 cells. Interestingly, triple negative cell lines were in the sensitive range. Differences in cell cycle populations were also observed, with a representative panel of sensitive cells showing an increased G1/G0 arrest and decrease in S-phase population when compared to insensitive cell lines. Delving deeper, mitochondrial respiration was decreased in the sensitive cell lines. We also observed greater changes in morphology in the sensitive cell lines than the insensitive when grown in 3D cell culture, potentially offering more relevance to our observations. These results confirm that there is a range of sensitivities to fluvastatin in breast cancer cell lines, allowing for further studies to determine the cause of these differences. The hints at metabolic differences could also lead to novel co-treatments with statins and greater therapeutic benefit. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2011 Nov 12-16; San Francisco, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2011;10(11 Suppl):Abstract nr C165.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Cancer TherapeuticsSame topicCancer, Lipids, and MetabolismFrench-language works237,207