Recent concepts in the inhibition of radiographic progression with biologics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To provide an update on new concepts in the inhibition of radiographic progression with current and emerging biologic therapy. RECENT FINDINGS: The advent of biologic therapies for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis has given rise to the concept of a disconnect between clinical and radiographic outcomes. Radiographic progression has been observed in patients in clinical remission, whereas inhibition of radiographic progression has been demonstrated in patients with clinically active disease. Moreover, imaging remission has been shown to be much easier to achieve than clinical remission. Biologics are superior to methotrexate (MTX) in inhibiting radiographic progression at every level of disease activity and response. The majority of patients receiving biologics and a significant proportion receiving MTX alone do not progress radiographically. The combination of a biologic and MTX inhibits radiographic progression more than either alone, reducing both the proportion of patients progressing and the degree of progression of those who do progress. Although biologics are similar in their ability to inhibit radiographic progression in most patients, they differ in inhibiting the progression in the rapid radiographic progressors. SUMMARY: The disconnect between clinical and radiographic outcomes demonstrated with biologics implies the need to monitor both outcomes in order to treat patients most effectively. The superiority of biologics over MTX in inhibiting radiographic progression suggests that the clinical target for a biologic may differ from that for MTX to prevent structural damage and preserve function. For most patients, radiographic inhibition should not affect the choice of a biologic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".