Numerical Solution of 3-D Water Entry Problems With a Constrained Interpolation Profile Method
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents the numerical solutions of slamming problems for 3D bodies entering calm water with vertical and oblique velocities. The highly nonlinear water entry problems are governed by the Navier-Stokes equations and were solved by a constrained interpolation profile (CIP)-based finite difference method on a fixed Cartesian grid. In the computation, the 3D CIP method was employed for the advection calculations and a pressure-based algorithm was applied for the nonadvection calculations. The solid body and the free surface interfaces were captured by density functions. For the pressure computation, a Poisson-type equation was solved at each time step by using the conjugate gradient iterative method. Validation studies were carried out for a 3D wedge, a cusped body vertically entering calm water, and the oblique entry of a sphere into calm water. The predicted hydrodynamic forces on the wedge, the cusped body, and the sphere were compared with experimental data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it