MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

ENDOSPERM FORMATION AFTER 2x, 4x CROSSES IN CERTAIN CEREALS, ESPECIALLY IN HORDEUM VULGARE

2010· article· en· W2053512157 on OpenAlexaff
ARTUR HÅKANSSON

Bibliographic record

VenueHereditas · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBotanical Research and Chemistry
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Genetics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHordeum vulgareEndospermBiologyCitationBotanyGeneticsLibrary sciencePoaceaeComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

N the late twenties and early thirties the cause of the abortion of I seeds formed after species crosses was much discussed.Related species or forms having a different number of genomes give, when crossed, very bad seeds.WATKINS, THOMPSON, THOMPSON and CAMERON, and WAEAEUWA published papers on seed development after reciprocal crosses between tetraploid and hexaploid species of Triticum; later, BOYES and THOMPSON included diploid Triticum species in the crosses.Hybridizations between diploid, tetraploid and hexaploid species of Avena were studie\d by KIHARA and NISHIYAMA who found that, as in Triticum, endosperm development had a different aspect in reciprocal crosses.As a rule, seed development is better when the mother plant has the higher chromosome number; on the other hand, a larger difference in the number of genomes between the crossed plants causes more pronounced disturbances.The happy idea was conceived by MUNTZING (1930) that the causes of seed degeneration in the crosses referred to were of a quantitative rather than a qualitative nature.He pointed to the fact that crosses between a diploid and its autotetraploid also result in bad seeds.In normal seeds the relation between the chromosome numbers of the maternal tissue of the ovule, the endosperm and the embryo is 2: 3: 2, but after crosses between plants with different numbers of genomes this ratio in the seeds is altered with physiological and morphological disturbances as a consequence.In a second paper MUNTZING (1933) more closely discussed this theory and refuted certain other interpretations of the causes of the seed abortion.He pointed out the farreaching consequence of this kind of sterility facilitating the forming of polyploid species in angiosperms.Later, seed development in reciprocal crosses between a diploid and its autotetraploid has been investigated, e. g., in the cereals Secale cereale ( HAPANSSON and ELLERSTR~M, 1950; L~WENSTEIN, 195 I) and

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueHereditasSame topicBotanical Research and ChemistryFrench-language works237,207