MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Portrayal of Tourette's Syndrome in Film and Television (P06.041)

2012· article· en· W2053566288 on OpenAlexaff
Samantha Calder‐Sprackman, Asif Doja, Sarah Sutherland

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRepresentation (politics)DepictionMisinformationMisrepresentationTourette syndromePsychologyTicsAutism spectrum disorderAutismArtPsychiatryLiteratureComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: To determine the representation of Tourette9s Syndrome (TS) in fictional movies and television programs by investigating recurrent themes and depictions. Background Television and film can be a source of information and misinformation about medical disorders. TS has received attention in the popular media, but no studies have been done on the accuracy of the depiction of the disease. Given this, we sought to analyze the representation of TS in fictional television programs and films. Design/Methods: International internet movie databases were searched using the terms “Tourette9s”, “Tourette9s Syndrome”, and “tics” to generate all movies, shorts, and television programs featuring a character or scene with TS or a person imitating TS. Movies and television programs were excluded if they were nonfiction, or in foreign languages that were not subtitled or dubbed in English. After viewing, movies were further excluded based on relevance. Using a grounded theory approach, we identified the types of characters, tics, and co-morbidities depicted as well as the overall representation of TS. Results: 37 television programs and films were reviewed dating from 1976 to 2010. Fictional movies and television shows gave an overall misrepresentation of TS. Tics depicted had a disproportionate representation on coprolalia. Furthermore, characters were sometimes depicted as having symptoms similar to autism spectrum disorder rather than TS. The role of physicians was portrayed as unsympathetic and only focusing their treatment on medical therapies. Finally, school, family and relationships were nearly always depicted as being negatively impacted by TS, leading to a poor quality of life for characters with TS. Conclusions: Films and television are an easily accessible resource for patients and the public that may influence their beliefs about TS. Physicians should be aware that TS is often inaccurately represented in television programs and film and acknowledge such misrepresentations in order to counsel patients accordingly. Disclosure: Dr. Calder-Sprackman has nothing to disclose. Dr. Doja has nothing to disclose. Dr. Sutherland has nothing to disclose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.474

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurologySame topicObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersFrench-language works237,207