Discovery of okadaic acid esters in the toxic dinoflagellate <i>Dinophysis acuta</i> from New Zealand using liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The dinoflagellate Dinophysis acuta has been associated with various incidents of diarrhetic shellfish poisoning. A sample of Dinophysis acuta collected from New Zealand waters in 2002 was previously found to contain high levels of pectenotoxins, but only a very low level of the diarrhea-inducing okadaic acid (OA). After hydrolysis under basic conditions, however, the concentration of OA increased substantially, indicating the presence of conjugated forms of OA. Using various liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (LC/ESI-MS/MS) techniques, a number of OA esters were detected in the original extract. The principal compound was identified as a C8 diol-ester of OA (OA-D8), which had been identified previously in another dinoflagellate, Prorocentrum lima. The retention time, as well as positive and negative ion MS, MS/MS and UV spectra of the D. acuta compound, matched exactly those of OA-D8 isolated from P. lima. In addition to OA-D8, several other novel OA esters were detected in the D. acuta but these have not yet been identified. This is the first report identifying the presence of OA esters in Dinophysis species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".