Site-Response Spectra for POLARIS Station Sites in Southern Ontario and Quebec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Research Article| November 01, 2008 Site-Response Spectra for POLARIS Station Sites in Southern Ontario and Quebec Kimberly Read; Kimberly Read Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, N6A 5B9, Canada helnaggar@eng.uwo.ca (H.E.N.) Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Hesham El Naggar; Hesham El Naggar Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, N6A 5B9, Canada helnaggar@eng.uwo.ca (H.E.N.) Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar David Eaton David Eaton Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, N6A 5B9, Canada helnaggar@eng.uwo.ca (H.E.N.) Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Kimberly Read Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, N6A 5B9, Canada helnaggar@eng.uwo.ca (H.E.N.) Hesham El Naggar Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, N6A 5B9, Canada helnaggar@eng.uwo.ca (H.E.N.) David Eaton Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, N6A 5B9, Canada helnaggar@eng.uwo.ca (H.E.N.) Publisher: Seismological Society of America First Online: 09 Mar 2017 Online ISSN: 1938-2057 Print ISSN: 0895-0695 © 2008 by the Seismological Society of America Seismological Research Letters (2008) 79 (6): 776–784. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.79.6.776 Article history First Online: 09 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Permissions Search Site Citation Kimberly Read, Hesham El Naggar, David Eaton; Site-Response Spectra for POLARIS Station Sites in Southern Ontario and Quebec. Seismological Research Letters 2008;; 79 (6): 776–784. doi: https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.79.6.776 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietySeismological Research Letters Search Advanced Search Local geologic and soil conditions can greatly increase the intensity of earthquake ground shaking (Kramer 1996). These local site effects are particularly significant at sites with deep, soft soil deposits, although hard rock sites may also exhibit amplification (Siddiqqi and Atkinson 2002). Estimation of this localized site response can be accomplished using theoretical or empirical methods. Theoretical modeling requires extensive characterization of a site's near-surface geology, as well as the use of sophisticated computing methods. In contrast, empirical approaches require only ground-motion data records from the site. The relative ease of application has popularized the use... You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.029 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".