Changes in the deep and bottom waters of the Scotia Sea 1995-1999
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The World Ocean Circulation Experiment (WOCE) is a component of the World Climate Research Programme (WCRP), which was established by WMO and ICSU, and is carried out in association with IOC and SCOR.WOCE is an unprecedented effort by scientists from more than 30 nations to study the large-scale circulation of the ocean.In addition to global observations furnished by satellites, conventional in-situ physical and chemical observations have been made in order to obtain a basic description of the physical properties and circulation of the global ocean during a limited period.The field phase of the project lasted from 1990-1997 and is now being followed by Analysis, Interpretation, Modelling and Synthesis activities.This, the AIMS phase of WOCE, will continue to the year 2002.The information gathered during WOCE will provide the data necessary to make major improvements in the accuracy of numerical models of ocean circulation.As these models improve, they will enhance coupled models of the ocean/atmosphere circulation to better simulate -and perhaps ultimately predicthow the ocean and the atmosphere together cause global climate change over long periods.WOCE is supporting regional experiments, the knowledge from which should improve circulation models, and it is exploring design criteria for long-term ocean observing system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".