MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Design and Characterization of an Aequorin‐based Bacterial Biosensor for Detection of Toluene and Related Compounds

2010· article· en· W2053660315 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Mehdi Zeinoddini, Khosro Khajeh, Farida Behzadian, Saman Hosseinkhani, Alireza Saeedinia, Hesam Barjesteh

Bibliographic record

VenuePhotochemistry and Photobiology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Topicbioluminescence and chemiluminescence research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMerck Canada
KeywordsAequorinBioreporterBioluminescenceBiosensorActivator (genetics)Molecular biologyOperonChemistrylac operonPromoterEscherichia coliBiologyBiochemistryReporter geneGene expressionReceptorGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An aequorin-based Escherichia coli strain JM109 biosensor was constructed and characterized for its potential to detect toluene and related compounds in aqueous solutions. The biosensor was constructed based on a PGL2 plasmid carrying the lower pathway promoter (Pu) of the xyl operon of Pseudomonas putida mt-2, which was incorporated with transcriptional activator xylR and fused to aequorin cDNA named pGL2-aequorin. Binding of xylR protein to a subset of toluene-like compounds activates transcription at the Pu promoter, thus expression of aequorin is controlled by xylR and Pu. In this work we have compared the effect of Shine-Dalgarno (SD) and T2 rrnβ terminator sequence in the expression of aequorin. According to the sensitivity of aequorin and increase in the signal-to-noise ratio, this reporter enzyme has reasonable sensitivity compared with other reporter systems. The results indicate higher expression of aequorin in the presence of SD and T2 rrnβ. The activity of aequorin in recombinant whole-cell biosensor was linear from 1 to 500 μm of toluene. The bioluminescence response was specific for toluene-like molecules, so this biosensor cells would be able to detect toluene derivative contamination in environmental samples, accurately.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.511

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhotochemistry and PhotobiologySame topicbioluminescence and chemiluminescence researchFrench-language works237,207