Bismethylene Triphosphate Nucleotides of Uridine 4-Phosphate Analogues: A New Class of Anionic Pyrimidine Nucleotide Analogues
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cytidine-5'-triphosphate synthase (CTPS) catalyzes the formation of cytidine triphosphate (CTP) from glutamine, uridine 5'-triphosphate (UTP), and adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP). This reaction proceeds via formation of the high-energy intermediate UTP-4-phosphate (UTP-4-P). Stable analogues of UTP-4-P may be potent inhibitors of CTPS and useful as lead structures for the development of anticancer and antiviral agents. Several bismethylene triphosphate (BMT) nucleotides of uridine 4-phosphate (U-4-P) analogues have been prepared. A key step was the selective methanolysis, with the aid of a tin catalyst, of the 5' ester moiety of 2',3',5'-tri-O-acetyl or tri-O-benzoyl U-4-P analogues. We believe this represents the first general approach to the selective cleavage of 5' benzoyl esters in benzoylated nucleosides. Mitsunobu coupling of these 5'-deprotected U-4-P analogues to an unsymmetrical, protected BMT bearing a free phosphonic acid moiety at one of the terminal positions gave fully protected BMT-U-4-P analogues. Global deprotection of these species was achieved using TMSBr followed by treatment with NH4OH-MeOH or NH4OH-pyridine. The resulting BMT nucleotides represent a new class of anionic pyrimidine nucleotide analogues.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".