MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053804046 · doi:10.1142/s021830130000009x

THE ROLE OF Δ(1232) IN TWO-PION EXCHANGE THREE-NUCLEON POTENTIAL

2000· article· en· W2053804046 on OpenAlex
Karabi Kabir, T. K. Datta, Muslema Pervin, L. M. Nath

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Modern Physics E · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
Canadian institutionsAtomic Energy (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsPionNucleonLagrangianResonance (particle physics)AmplitudeParticle physicsScatteringChiral symmetryEffective field theoryScattering amplitudeSymmetry (geometry)Field theory (psychology)Quantum electrodynamicsMathematical physicsQuantum mechanicsMathematicsQuark

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we have studied the two-pion exchange three-nucleon potential (2πE-3NP) using an approximate SU(2)×SU(2) chiral symmetry of the strong interaction. The off-shell pion-nucleon scattering amplitudes obtained from the Weinberg Lagrangian are supplemented with contributions from the well-known σ-term and the Δ(1232) exchange. It is the role of the Δ-resonance in 2πE-3NP, which we have investigated in detail in the framework of the Lagrangian field theory. The Δ-contribution is quite appreciable and, more significantly, it is dependent on a parameter Z which is arbitrary but has the empirical bounds |Z|≤1/2. We find that the Δ-contribution to the important parameters of the 2πE-3NP depends on the choice of a value for Z, although the correction to the binding energy of triton is not expected to be very sensitive to the variation of Z within its bounds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.889
Threshold uncertainty score0.426

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it