MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053815498 · doi:10.1159/000008221

Periodic Arm Movements in Patients with the Restless Legs Syndrome

2000· article· en· W2053815498 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Neurology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRestless Legs Syndrome Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal
FundersMedical Research Council
KeywordsRestless legs syndromeWakefulnessSleep (system call)Neurological disorderMedicineAnesthesiaNocturnalLumbarRapid eye movement sleepPhysical medicine and rehabilitationPsychologyEye movementCentral nervous system diseaseNeuroscienceElectroencephalographyNeurologyInternal medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A high proportion of patients with restless legs syndrome (RLS) also complain of arm paresthesia but the presence of periodic arm movements (PAM) has never been documented in a sleep laboratory in these patients. We investigated the prevalence of PAM during nocturnal sleep and awakenings in 22 RLS patients. Fifteen patients had a PAM index >5 movements per hour during wakefulness and among them only 3 had a PAM index >5 during sleep. Twenty patients had a periodic leg movement (PLM) index >5 during wakefulness and 17 had a PLM index >5 during sleep. In 42.8% of cases, PAM showed temporal relationship with PLM during wakefulness. These results show that PAM is frequent in RLS and suggest that the basic neurological dysfunction responsible for RLS is probably not located exclusively at the level of the lumbar spinal cord but involves neuronal systems located at upper levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it