PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS AMONG STREPTOPHYTES AS INFERRED FROM CHLOROPLAST SMALL AND LARGE SUBUNIT rRNA GENE SEQUENCES<sup>1</sup>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To gain insights into the phylogeny of charophytes and into their relationships with other green algae and bryophytes, we analyzed the chloroplast small and large subunit rRNA sequences of charophytes belonging to five orders (Charales, Coleochaetales, Desmidiales, Klebsormidiales, and Zygnematales), of chlorophytes from the four remaining classes of green algae, and of bryophytes representing the three classes reported in this group of land plants. We also probed the gene organization and intron content of the chloroplast rDNA operon in charophytes and bryophytes. The organization of this operon proved to be highly conserved, except in members of the Desmidiales and Zygnematales. Homologous group II introns were identified in the trnA (UGC) gene of all charophyte groups examined and in the trnI (GAU) gene of charophytes from all orders except the Desmidiales and Zygnematales. Phylogenetic analyses of concatenated rDNA sequences consistently placed the prasinophyte Mesostigma viride Lauterborn at the base of the Streptophyta and Chlorophyta, although alternative topologies positioning Mesostigma within the Streptophyta could not be rejected. A sister group relationship was unambiguously established between Chaetosphaeridium globosum (Nordstedt) Klebahn and members of the Coleochaetales. The Charales, Coleochaetales, Desmidiales, and Zygnematales were found to be monophyletic, and a sister group relationship was observed for the Desmidiales and Zygnematales. Although our analyses failed to resolve the branching order of the Coleochaetales, Charales, Desmidiales/Zygnematales, and bryophytes, they revealed that the problematic charophyte taxon Entransia fimbriata Hughes strongly clusters with Klebsormidium flaccidum (Kützing) Silva, Mattox et Blackwell to form a basal lineage relative to the other charophyte orders examined.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".