Conformational Changes in Thrombin When Complexed by Serpins
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Thrombin possesses two positively charged surface domains, termed exosites, that orient substrates and inhibitors for reaction with the enzyme. Because the exosites also allosterically modulate thrombin's activity, we set out to determine whether the structure or function of the exosites changes when thrombin forms complexes with antithrombin, heparin cofactor II, or alpha(1)-antitrypsin (M358R), serpins that utilize both, one, or neither of the exosites, respectively. Using a hirudin-derived peptide to probe the integrity of exosite 1, no binding was detected when thrombin was complexed with heparin cofactor II or alpha(1)-antitrypsin (M358R), and the peptide exhibited a 55-fold lower affinity for the thrombin-antithrombin complex than for thrombin. Bound peptide or HD-1, an exosite 1-binding DNA aptamer, was displaced from thrombin by each of the three serpins. Thrombin binding to fibrin also was abrogated when the enzyme was complexed with serpins. These data reveal that, regardless of the initial mode of interaction, the function of exosite 1 is lost when thrombin is complexed by serpins. In contrast, the integrity of exosite 2 is largely retained when thrombin is complexed by serpins, because interaction with heparin or an exosite 2-directed DNA aptamer was only modestly altered. The disorganization of exosite 1 that occurs when thrombin is complexed by serpins is consistent with results of protease sensitivity studies and crystallographic analysis of a homologous enzyme-serpin complex.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".