Development to Blastocyst Is Impaired When Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Is Performed with Abnormal Sperm from Infertile Mice Harboring a Mutation in the Protein Phosphatase 1cγ Gene1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Idiopathic azoospermia, characterized by abnormal spermatogenesis, is commonly treated by performing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with sperm retrieved from testicular biopsies. However, no controlled experiments have been performed using an animal model to assess the efficacy or safety of the procedure. We have performed ICSI with testicular sperm obtained in a similar manner from testes of male mice homozygous for a null mutation in the protein phosphatase 1cgamma gene (PP1cgamma) or those of their wild-type littermates. PP1cgamma mutant testicular sperm are less resistant to sonication than are wild-type sperm and display a range of morphological abnormalities, similar to those reported for testicular sperm from idiopathic azoospermic men. PP1cgamma mutant sperm are unable to support development to the blastocyst stage, resulting in arrested development either before or just after compaction. A comparison of testicular and epididymal sperm from wild-type males revealed that the epididymal sperm caused embryos to fragment at an elevated rate. These results suggest that ICSI with any kind of testicular sperm carries an increased risk of embryo fragmentation and that abnormal testicular sperm has an added risk of embryo wastage at later preimplantation stages.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".