MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Direct measurement of shear modulus at low frequencies and small strains

2009· article· en· W2053907069 on OpenAlexaff
James Day, O. Syshchenko, John Beamish

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Conference Series · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum, superfluid, helium dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceShear modulusPiezoelectricityTransducerPiezoelectric coefficientElastic modulusAcousticsShear stressShear (geology)Young's modulusComposite materialOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In many applications, one needs to measure elastic moduli of materials at low frequencies and small strains. With most techniques, such as ultrasonic pulse transmission or acoustic resonance, measurements are limited to a few discrete frequencies. These sound speed measurements are also indirect, since they involve density as well as elastic constants. We have developed a direct, quasi-static method to measure the shear modulus of solid 4 He. A 4 He crystal is grown in a narrow gap (0.2 to 0.5 mm) between two rigidly mounted lead zirconium titanate (PZT) piezoelectric transducers. A voltage applied to one transducer generates a shear displacement at its surface and a corresponding shear strain in the sample. The resulting shear stress at the surface of the second transducer generates a piezoelectric charge which is measured using a low noise current amplifier. The ratio between the measured stress and the applied strain gives the sample's shear modulus. Measurements can be made at any frequency between the mechanical resonances of the sample holder and cell (around 8 kHz in our arrangement) and a few Hz (a limit set by our current amplifier). At 2000 Hz, the minimum detectable stress is about 10 -5 Pa, corresponding to a strain of order 10 -12 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Conference SeriesSame topicQuantum, superfluid, helium dynamicsFrench-language works237,207