MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Vascular Response to Extended Wear of Hydrogel Lenses with High and Low Oxygen Permeability

2001· article· en· W2053920035 on OpenAlexaff
Kathryn Dumbleton, Robin L. Chalmers, Doris Richter, D. Fonn

Bibliographic record

VenueOptometry and Vision Science · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOcular Surface and Contact Lens
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOphthalmologyMedicineContact lensNeovascularizationOxygen permeabilityReactive hyperemiaCorneal neovascularizationBlood flowAngiogenesisInternal medicineChemistryOxygen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of extended wear of high and low oxygen permeability (Dk) lenses on the development or resolution of limbal hyperemia and corneal neovascularization in a randomized prospective clinical trial. METHODS: Adapted daily-wear contact lens wearers were randomly assigned to one of two groups. The low-Dk group (N = 23) wore etafilcon A lenses (Dk/t = 40) for up to 7 days and 6 nights, and the high-Dk group (N = 39) wore lotrafilcon A lenses (Dk/t = 175) for up to 30 days and nights. Limbal hyperemia and neovascularization were assessed and graded during 9 months of extended wear. A stratified analysis to determine how change in ocular redness depended on initial presentation was also conducted. RESULTS: On a 0 to 100 scale, extended wear of low-Dk lenses resulted in a 16-point increase in limbal hyperemia (p < 0.0001); no significant change occurred with the high-Dk lenses. The difference was greatest for low-Dk participants who initially presented with lower levels of hyperemia (N = 18). There was a slight resolution of redness in participants who initially presented with higher levels of hyperemia (N = 10) after wearing the high-Dk lenses. Neovascularization increased by an average of 0.5 on a scale of 0 to 4 in low-Dk lens wearers (p < 0.0001) but remained unchanged in the high-Dk lens wearers. The increase was most marked for the low-Dk group with lower levels of neovascularization at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Subjects who wore lenses with higher oxygen permeability for 9 months of extended wear exhibited a lower vascular response of the ocular surface compared with subjects who wore lenses of lower oxygen permeability for the same period. This result was found both for the surface limbal vessels and in the deeper neovascular stromal vessels. Moderate neovascularization also developed after 3 months of extended wear of low-Dk hydrogels, whereas high-Dk lenses caused no neovascularization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations112
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptometry and Vision ScienceSame topicOcular Surface and Contact LensFrench-language works237,207