Reactivity of the bridged-sulfide complex Pd<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>2</sub>(μ-S)(μ-dmpm)<sub>2</sub>toward electrophiles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The dipalladium(I) complex Pd(2)Cl(2)(dmpm)(2) (1a) [dmpm = bis(dimethylphosphino)methane] is known to react with elemental sulfur (S(8)) to give the bridged-sulfide complex Pd(2)Cl(2)(μ-S)(dmpm)(2) (2a) but, in the presence of excess S(8), PdCl(2)[P,S-dmpm(S)] (4a) and dmpm(S)(2) are generated. Treatment of 1a with elemental selenium (Se(8)), however, gives only Pd(2)Cl(2)(μ-Se)(dmpm)(2) (3a). Complex 4a is best made by reaction of trans-PdCl(2)(PhCN)(2) with dmpm(S). Complex 2a reacts with MeI to yield initially Pd(2)I(2)(μ-S)(dmpm)(2) and MeCl, and then Pd(2)I(2)(μ-I)(2)(dmpm)(2) and Me(2)S, whereas alkylation of 2a with MeOTf generates the cationic, bridged-methanethiolato complex [Pd(2)Cl(2)(μ-SMe)(dmpm)(2)]OTf (5). Oxidation of 2a with m-CPBA forms a mixture of Pd(2)Cl(2)(μ-SO)(dmpm)(2) and Pd(2)Cl(2)(μ-SO(2))(dmpm)(2), whereas Pd(2)Br(2)(μ-S)(dmpm)(2) reacts selectively to give Pd(2)Br(2)(μ-SO)(dmpm)(2) (6b). Treatment of the Pd(2)X(2)(μ-S)(dmpm)(2) complexes with X(2) (X = halogen) removes the bridged-sulfide as S(8), with co-production of Pd(II)(dmpm)-halide species. X-ray structures of 3a, 5 and 6b are presented. Reactions of dmpm with S(8) and Se(8) are clarified. Differences in the chemistry of the dmpm systems with that of the corresponding dppm systems [dppm = bis(diphenylphosphino)methane] are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".