MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053962169 · doi:10.1042/bst0320803

Glycogen synthase kinase-3 in insulin and Wnt signalling: a double-edged sword?

2004· review· en· W2053962169 on OpenAlexafffund
Satish Patel, Bradley W. Doble, James R. Woodgett

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemical Society Transactions · 2004
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicWnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer
Canadian institutionsOntario Institute for Cancer Research
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsGSK-3BiologyWnt signaling pathwayProtein kinase AGlycogen synthaseKinaseCell biologySignal transductionPhosphorylation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glycogen synthase kinase-3 is an unusual protein serine/threonine kinase that, unlike most of its 500-odd relatives in the genome, is active under resting conditions and is inactivated upon cell stimulation. The two mammalian isoforms, GSK-3alpha and beta, play largely overlapping roles and have been implicated in a variety of human pathologies, including Type II diabetes, Alzheimer's disease, bipolar disorder and cancer. Recently, the modes of regulation of this enzyme have been elucidated through a combination of structural and cell biological studies. A series of relatively selective small molecules have facilitated chemical manipulation of the enzyme in intact cells and tissues, and new roles for the protein kinase in embryonic stem cell differentiation and motility have emerged. Despite these advances, the therapeutic value of this enzyme as a drug target remains clouded by uncertainty over the potential of antagonists to promote tumorigenesis. This article describes the state of understanding of this intriguing enzyme, and weighs current evidence regarding whether there is a therapeutic window for amelioration of diseases in which it is implicated, in the absence of inducing new pathologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations148
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemical Society TransactionsSame topicWnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancerFrench-language works237,207