MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2053978123 · doi:10.1002/cmr.b.20097

Modal analysis of a multilayered gradient coil insert in a 4‐T MRI scanner

2007· article· en· W2053978123 on OpenAlexafffund
Fenglin Wang, Chris K. Mechefske

Bibliographic record

VenueConcepts in Magnetic Resonance Part B · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsScannerElectromagnetic coilAcousticsModalVibrationModal analysisModal testingBendingNoise (video)CylinderVoice coilPhysicsMaterials scienceNuclear magnetic resonanceStructural engineeringOpticsComputer scienceMechanical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In ultrahigh field strength Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), the pulsed electrical currents passing through gradient coil windings cause powerful alternating forces that act on the gradient coil structure and create structural vibration and consequential acoustic noise (as high as 130 dB). The dynamic response of the gradient coil cylinder largely determines the acoustic noise generated in terms of frequency components, sound pressure levels (SPL), and the spatial distribution within the bore of the scanner. The objective of this article is to characterize the dynamic behavior of a real (multilayered) gradient coil insert in a 4‐T MRI scanner (from 200 to 3,000 Hz). The simply supported (assembly condition) and free–free (modal testing) condition are investigated in the dynamic analysis. In‐situ vibration testing, modal testing, and numerical analyses are applied to uncover the dynamic features. The results indicate that bending modes in combination with different specific free–free and simply supported radial mode shapes provide the fundamental characteristics of the dynamic behavior of the gradient coil cylinder in the frequency range tested. The change in dominant bending mode as a function of scanning input frequency was also studied. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Concepts Magn Reson Part B (Magn Reson Engineering) 31B: 237–254, 2007

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.272
Threshold uncertainty score0.614

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConcepts in Magnetic Resonance Part BSame topicUltrasonics and Acoustic Wave PropagationFrench-language works237,207