Vitamin C Augments the Inotropic Response to Dobutamine in Humans With Normal Left Ventricular Function
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We studied the effect of an antioxidant, the intracoronary infusion of vitamin C, on basal and dobutamine-stimulated left ventricular (LV) contractility. METHODS AND RESULTS: Nineteen patients with normal ventricular function participated in this study. A micromanometer-tipped catheter was inserted into the LV. In the experimental group (n=10), an infusion catheter was positioned in the left main coronary artery. LV peak +dP/dt (LV +dP/dt) was measured in response to the intravenous infusion of dobutamine before (Dob) and during (Dob+vit C) the intracoronary infusion of vitamin C. The intracoronary infusion of vitamin C had no effect on basal LV +dP/dt or any other hemodynamic parameter. The infusion of vitamin C augmented the LV +dP/dt response to dobutamine by 22+/-4% (Dob, 1680+/-76 mm Hg/s; Dob+vit C, 1814+/-97 mm Hg/s, P<0.01). In the control group (n=9), LV +dP/dt was measured in response to sequential infusions of dobutamine (Dob, Dob-2) given at the same time intervals as in the experimental group but without the intracoronary infusion of vitamin C. In contrast to the experimental group, no difference in LV +dP/dt was observed between the 2 infusions of dobutamine (Dob, 1706+/-131 mm Hg/s; Dob-2, 1709+/-138 mm Hg/s, P=NS). CONCLUSIONS: The administration of the antioxidant vitamin C augments the inotropic response to dobutamine in humans. This suggests that redox environment contributes to the adrenergic regulation of ventricular contractility.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".