MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Evidence For Impaired Exercising Forearm And Leg Muscle Blood Flow At Higher Exercise Intensity In Copd

2009· article· en· W2053999238 on OpenAlexaff
Katherine A. Webb, Denis E. O’Donnell, Michael E. Tschakovsky

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSports Performance and Training
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForearmMedicineCOPDCardiologyExercise intoleranceInternal medicineHeart rateBlood flowPhysical therapyBrachial arteryBlood pressureExercise intensityAnesthesiaSurgeryHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is characterized by extreme exercise intolerance. Patients often report leg discomfort as the reason for stopping, both during a progressive exercise test and during continuous exercise. Given the impact of compromised oxygen delivery on exercise performance it is possible that exercise intolerance is in part due to reduced exercising muscle oxygen delivery. PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that exercising muscle oxygen delivery in both small (forearm handgrip) and large (leg kicking) muscle mass exercise is compromised in COPD. METHODS: 12 COPD (59.4 ±2.7 yrs, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) 42.6 ±4.0% predicted) and 12 age and activity matched control subjects (60.5 ±2.8 yrs) participated in four exercise protocols on separate occasions: progressive increases in forearm handgrip and knee extension/flexion exercise to exhaustion, and step increases in forearm handgrip and knee extension/flexion to 50% peak work rate. Beat by beat Doppler and Echo ultrasound measures of forearm blood flow (FBF; brachial artery) and leg blood flow (LBF; femoral artery) and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP; arterial tonometry, Colin 5000), arterial oxygen saturation were made. Venous blood samples provided measures of Hb content (StatProfile M Blood Gas Analyzer, Nova Biomedical) RESULTS: data are mean ±SE. Peak forearm exercise intensity (weight lifted in lbs) for COPD was 83% of control (33.7 ±2.7 vs. 40.7 ±3.0). Forearm oxygen delivery (FOD; ml O2/min) was similar between COPD and Control until exercise intensity reached 25 lbs (COPD vs. Control FOD 76 ±5 vs. 96 ±9, P=0.058). However, there were no differences in any parameters quantifying blood flow kinetics with step increase to 50% peak (all P>0.60). Responses for leg exercise mirrored those for the forearm. CONCLUSIONS: Oxygen delivery to exercising muscle in COPD may be compromised at higher exercise intensities in both small and large muscle mass exercise. However, the speed with which oxygen delivery adjusts at exercise onset is not.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicSports Performance and Training→French-language works237,207→