Practical Implementation of 2D HPLC Scheme with Accurate Peptide Retention Prediction in Both Dimensions for High-Throughput Bottom-Up Proteomics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We describe the practical implementation of a new RP (pH 10 - pH 2) 2D HPLC-ESI/MS scheme for large-scale bottom-up analysis in proteomics. When compared to the common SCX-RP approach, it provides a higher separation efficiency in the first dimension and increases the number of identified peptides/proteins. We also employed the methodology of our sequence-specific retention calculator (SSRCalc) and developed peptide retention prediction algorithms for both LC dimensions. A diverse set of approximately 10,000 tryptic peptides from the soluble protein fraction of whole NK-type cells gave retention time versus hydrophobicity correlations, with R (2) values of 0.95 for pH 10 and 0.945 for pH 2 (formic acid) separation modes. The superior separation efficiency and the ability to use retention prediction to filter out false-positive MS/MS identifications gives promise that this approach will be a method of choice for large-scale proteomics analyses in the future. Finally, the "semi-orthogonal" separation selectivity permits the concatenation of fractions in the first dimension of separation before the final LC-ESI MS step, effectively cutting the analysis time in half, while resulting in a minimal reduction in protein identification.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".