MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054017627 · doi:10.1063/1.2166364

Phosphodiester and N-glycosidic bond cleavage in DNA induced by 4–15 eV electrons

2006· article· en· W2054017627 on OpenAlexafffund
Yi Zheng, Pierre Cloutier, Darel J. Hunting, J. Richard Wagner, Léon Sanche

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsPhosphodiester bondChemistryBond cleavageDissociation (chemistry)Glycosidic bondCrystallographyCleavage (geology)Excited stateFragmentation (computing)PhotochemistryOrganic chemistryAtomic physicsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thin molecular films of the short single strand of DNA, GCAT, were bombarded under vacuum by electrons with energies between 4 and 15 eV. Ex vacuo analysis by high-pressure liquid chromatography of the samples exposed to the electron beam revealed the formation of a multitude of products. Among these, 12 fragments of GCAT were identified by comparison with reference compounds and their yields were measured as a function of electron energy. For all energies, scission of the backbone gave nonmodified fragments containing a terminal phosphate, with negligible amounts of fragments without the phosphate group. This indicates that phosphodiester bond cleavage by 4-15 eV electrons involves cleavage of the C-O bond rather than the P-O bond. The yield functions exhibit maxima at 6 and 10-12 eV, which are interpreted as due to the formation of transient anions leading to fragmentation. Below 15 eV, these resonances dominate bond dissociation processes. All four nonmodified bases are released from the tetramer, by cleavage of the N-glycosidic bond, which occurs principally via the formation of core-excited resonances located around 6 and 10 eV. The formation of the other nonmodified products leading to cleavage of the phosphodiester bond is suggested to occur principally via two different mechanisms: (1) the formation of a core-excited resonance on the phosphate unit followed by dissociation of the transient anion and (2) dissociation of the CO bond of the phosphate group formed by resonance electron transfer from the bases. In each case, phosphodiester bond cleavage leads chiefly to the formation of stable phosphate anions and sugar radicals with minimal amounts of alkoxyl anions and phosphoryl radicals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.363

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations79
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207