MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054030079 · doi:10.1111/epi.12208

Abnormal white matter correlates with neuropsychological impairment in children with localization‐related epilepsy

2013· article· en· W2054030079 on OpenAlexafffund
Elysa Widjaja, Jovanka Skocic, Cristina Go, O. Carter Snead, Donald Mabbott, Mary Lou Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueEpilepsia · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsEpilepsyNeuropsychologyFractional anisotropyWhite matterDiffusion MRIPsychologyMagnetic resonance imagingExecutive functionsNeuropsychological assessmentAudiologyMedicinePediatricsPsychiatryCognitionRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: The white matter (WM) is considered critical for linking cortical processing networks necessary for cognition. The aim of this study was to assess diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) measures of regional WM in children with nonlesional localization-related epilepsy in comparison to controls, and to determine the relation between lobar WM and neuropsychological performance. METHODS: Forty children with nonlesional localization-related epilepsy and 25 healthy controls with no neurological or psychiatric disorders and normal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were recruited. All patients and controls underwent neuropsychological testing that evaluated intelligence, language, memory, executive function, and motor function, as well as DTI to assess regional WM measures of fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD). The regional FA and MD were compared between patients and controls, and correlated with neuropsychological function. The relations between regional FA and MD with age at seizure onset and duration of epilepsy were assessed. KEY FINDINGS: Twenty-one patients had left-sided and 19 patients had right-sided epilepsy. There were no significant differences in seizure-related variables including age at seizure onset, duration of epilepsy, seizure frequency, and number of antiepileptic medications, as well as no significant differences in neuropsychological function and DTI measures of white matter in left-sided compared to right-sided epilepsy. Therefore, all the patients with epilepsy were treated as one group. Patients with epilepsy performed significantly worse on intelligence (p < 0.001), language (p < 0.001), and executive function (p = 0.001) evaluation than controls. Patients had significantly reduced FA in left frontal (p = 0.015), right frontal (p = 0.004), left temporal (p = 0.039), right temporal (p = 0.003), right parietal (p = 0.014), and right occipital (p = 0.025) WM relative to controls. There were no significant regional WM differences (all p > 0.05) in MD between patients and controls. There was a significant positive correlation between right temporal FA with language (r = 0.535, p < 0.001) and executive function (r = 0.617, p < 0.001), as well as between body of corpus callosum FA with intelligence (r = 0.536, p < 0.001) and language (r = 0.529, p < 0.001) in patients. Left parietal MD was significantly correlated with language (r = -0.545, p < 0.001) in patients. FA of right temporal WM was significantly associated with age at seizure onset (t = 4.97, p < 0.001). SIGNIFICANCE: There was widespread regional WM abnormality in children with nonlesional localization-related epilepsy, which was associated with impaired neuropsychological function. The impairment in WM may reflect disruption in the connectivity for cortical processing networks, which is necessary for the development of cognition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEpilepsiaSame topicEpilepsy research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207