Injections of Blood, Thrombin, and Plasminogen More Severely Damage Neonatal Mouse Brain Than Mature Mouse Brain
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The mechanism of brain cell injury associated with intracerebral hemorrhage may be in part related to proteolytic enzymes in blood, some of which are also functional in the developing brain. We hypothesized that there would be an age-dependent brain response following intracerebral injection of blood, thrombin, and plasminogen. Mice at 3 ages (neonatal, 10-day-old, and young adult) received autologous blood (15, 25, and 50 microl respectively), thrombin (3, 5, and 10 units respectively), plasminogen (0.03, 0.05, and 0.1 units respectively) (the doses expected in same volume blood), or saline injection into lateral striatum. Forty-eight hours later they were perfusion fixed. Hematoxylin and eosin, lectin histochemistry, Fluoro-Jade, and TUNEL staining were used to quantify changes related to the hemorrhagic lesion. Damage volume, dying neurons, neutrophils, and microglial reaction were significantly greater following injections of blood, plasminogen, and thrombin compared to saline in all three ages of mice. Plasminogen and thrombin associated brain damage was greatest in neonatal mice and, in that group unlike the other 2, greater than the damage caused by whole blood. These results suggest that the neonatal brain is relatively more sensitive to proteolytic plasma enzymes than the mature brain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it