MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054056741 · doi:10.1107/s0907444905004889

Structure of the subtilisin Carlsberg–OMTKY3 complex reveals two different ovomucoid conformations

2005· article· en· W2054056741 on OpenAlex
Jason T. Maynes, M.M. Cherney, M.A. Qasim, M. Laskowski, Michael N.G. James

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEnzyme Production and Characterization
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Institute of General Medical Sciences
KeywordsSubtilisinChemistryMoleculeStereochemistryEnzymeBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the most studied protein proteinase inhibitors is the turkey ovomucoid third domain, OMTKY3. This inhibitor contains a reactive-site loop (Lys13I-Arg21I) that binds in a nearly identical manner to all studied serine proteinases, regardless of their clan or specificity. The crystal structure of OMTKY3 bound to subtilisin Carlsberg (CARL) has been determined. There are two complete copies of the complexes in the crystallographic asymmetric unit. Whereas the two enzyme molecules are virtually identical [0.16 A root-mean-square difference (r.m.s.d.) for 274 C(alpha) atoms], the two inhibitor molecules show dramatic differences between one another (r.m.s.d. = 2.4 A for 50 C(alpha) atoms). When compared with other proteinase-bound OMTKY3 molecules, these inhibitors show even larger differences. This work facilitates a re-evaluation of the importance of certain ovomucoid residues in proteinase binding and explains why additivity and sequence-based binding-prediction methods fail for the CARL-OMTKY3 complex.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.861
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it