Morphological and Molecular Characterisation of <i>Notosolenus urceolatus</i> Larsen and Patterson 1990, a Member of an Understudied Deep‐branching Euglenid Group (Petalomonads)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Petalomonads are particularly important for understanding the early evolution of euglenids, but are arguably the least studied major group within this taxon. We have established a culture of the biflagellate petalomonad Notosolenus urceolatus, and conducted electron microscopy observations and molecular phylogenetic analysis. Notosolenus urceolatus has eight pellicular strips bordered by grooves and underlain by close-set microtubules. There are ventral and dorsal Golgi bodies. Mitochondria apparently contain fibrous inclusions, as in Petalomonas cantuscygni. A previously undocumented type of large, globular extrusome is present instead of the tubular extrusomes characteristic of Euglenozoa. The feeding apparatus lacks rods and vanes, and is partly supported by an "MTR". The flagella have complex transition zones that are extremely elongated but unswollen. Only the emergent portion of the anterior flagellum has an organised paraxonemal rod, and also has very fine mastigonemes. The basal bodies are offset and lack connecting fibres. 18S rRNA gene phylogenies show that N. urceolatus is closely related to Petalomonas sphagnophila and P. cantuscygni, not Notosolenus ostium, confirming that current generic assignments based on the number of emergent flagella are phylogenetically unreliable, and making it difficult to infer whether features shared by N. urceolatus and P. cantuscygni (for example) are general for petalomonads.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".