MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054137229 · doi:10.2310/7750.2014.14019

Granuloma Annulare as an Isotopic Response to Herpes Zoster

2014· review· en· W2054137229 on OpenAlexaff
Jonathan M. Levy, Duane Barber, Lynne Robertson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery · 2014
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSkin Diseases and Diabetes
Canadian institutionsCalgary Laboratory ServicesUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDermatomeGranuloma annulareMedicineShinglesDermatologyDepigmentationTrunkSurgeryImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Wolf's isotopic response is the phenomenon of a new skin disease occurring at the site of another unrelated and already healed skin disorder. Most cases in the literature report herpes zoster (HZ) as the original disease; however, the isotopic responses vary greatly. Including this case, our literature search revealed 32 cases of isotopic granuloma annulare (GA) following HZ. CASE REPORT: An 82-year-old male presented with GA localized to the right T9 dermatome that later appeared at other sites on the trunk and extremities. The patient had an episode of shingles involving the same dermatome 4 years earlier. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this is the first case report of GA occurring initially as an isotopic response in an HZ scar and subsequently becoming generalized. Thirty-eight percent (12 of 32) of patients with isotopic GA following HZ were immunocompromised, which is similar to the published rate of immunodeficiency in patients with HZ.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cutaneous Medicine and SurgerySame topicSkin Diseases and DiabetesFrench-language works237,207