MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054143423 · doi:10.1002/anie.201402750

A Series of Potent CREBBP Bromodomain Ligands Reveals an Induced‐Fit Pocket Stabilized by a Cation–π Interaction

2014· article· en· W2054143423 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Timothy P. C. Rooney, P. Filippakopoulos, O. Fedorov, S. Picaud, Wilian A. Cortopassi, Duncan A. Hay, Sarah Martin, Anthony Tumber, Catherine Rogers, Martin Philpott, Minghua Wang, Amber L. Thompson, Tom D. Heightman, David C. Pryde, Andrew S. Cook, Robert S. Paton, Susanne Müller, Stefan Knapp, Paul E. Brennan, Stuart J. Conway

Bibliographic record

VenueAngewandte Chemie International Edition · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Degradation and Inhibitors
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCiência sem FronteirasMinistero dello Sviluppo EconomicoWellcome TrustOntario Ministry of Economic Development and InnovationEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorGenome CanadaPfizerEli Lilly and Company
KeywordsBromodomainSeries (stratigraphy)ChemistryStereochemistryBiochemistryBiologyEpigenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The benzoxazinone and dihydroquinoxalinone fragments were employed as novel acetyl lysine mimics in the development of CREBBP bromodomain ligands. While the benzoxazinone series showed low affinity for the CREBBP bromodomain, expansion of the dihydroquinoxalinone series resulted in the first potent inhibitors of a bromodomain outside the BET family. Structural and computational studies reveal that an internal hydrogen bond stabilizes the protein-bound conformation of the dihydroquinoxalinone series. The side chain of this series binds in an induced-fit pocket forming a cation-π interaction with R1173 of CREBBP. The most potent compound inhibits binding of CREBBP to chromatin in U2OS cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.598

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations115
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAngewandte Chemie International EditionSame topicProtein Degradation and InhibitorsFrench-language works237,207