MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054164632 · doi:10.1177/0148607104028005355

Dexamethasone plus glucagon‐like peptide 2 given to lactating rat dams has a late effect on intestinal lipid uptake in the weanling offspring

2004· article· en· W2054164632 on OpenAlexaff
Claudiu Iordache, Laurie Drozdowski, Tom Clandinin, Gary Wild, Zoe Todd, AB Thomson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicRegulation of Appetite and Obesity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWeanlingInternal medicineEndocrinologyGlucagon-like peptide-2OffspringLactationDexamethasoneBiologyMedicineBiochemistryPregnancyPeptide

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Glucagon-like peptide 2 (GLP-2) has a trophic effect on the intestine and enhances intestinal absorption in adult animals, but its effect in young rats is unknown. Glucocorticosteroids accelerate the ontogeny of the intestine, and in adult animals they increase the uptake of sugars and lipids. We hypothesized that GLP-2 and dexamethasone (DEX), when administrated to lactating rat dams, will enhance lipid uptake in the suckling and weanling offspring. METHODS: Eight nursing rats were treated during lactation, 19 to 21 days, with GLP-2 (0.1 microg/g/d subcutaneously [s.c.]), DEX (0.128 microg/g/d s.c.), GLP-2 + DEX (GLP-2 0.1 microg/g/d s.c. plus DEX 0.128 microg/g/d s.c.), or placebo. Half of the offspring ("sucklings") were killed at 19 to 21 days of age, and half were killed 4 weeks later ("weanlings"). The rate of intestinal uptake of fatty acids (12:0, lauric; 16:0, palmitic; 18:0, stearic; 18:1, oleic; 18:2, linoleic; and 18:3, linolenic) and cholesterol were assessed using an in vitro ring technique. RESULTS: GLP-2 and DEX resulted in loss of body weight in sucklings, which was prevented by giving the combination GLP-2 + DEX. The jejunal atrophy in sucklings given DEX was prevented by giving GLP-2 + DEX, but GLP-2 + DEX did not prevent the decline in jejunal and ileal villous height and crypt depth observed in weanlings given DEX. GLP-2 had little effect on lipid uptake in sucklings, whereas DEX or GLP-2 + DEX increased the uptake of lipids. In contrast, in weanlings there was malabsorption of several lipids with GLP-2 or GLP-2 + DEX, but not with DEX. Lipid uptake was lower in weanlings than in sucklings, and this age-associated decline was not altered by GLP-2 or DEX. CONCLUSIONS: The loss of body weight and the jejunal atrophy induced by DEX in sucklings is prevented by adding GLP-2. Giving DEX or GLP-2 + DEX to lactating mothers enhances lipid uptake in their suckling offspring. In marked contrast, a month after lactating dams were given GLP-2 or GLP-2 + DEX, there was reduced lipid absorption in the postweaning animals. Thus, giving GLP-2 + DEX during lactation may be useful to enhance lipid uptake in the suckling offspring, without adverse effects on body weight or intestinal characteristics. However, the late effects of this treatment on lipid absorption were of concern, and could be potentially deleterious to the nutritional well-being of the animal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Parenteral and Enteral NutritionSame topicRegulation of Appetite and ObesityFrench-language works237,207