MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054189787 · doi:10.1080/10401330701334157

Abstracts from the Proceedings of the 2006 Annual Meeting of the Association of Directors of Medical Student Education in Psychiatry (ADMSEP)

2007· article· en· W2054189787 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ruth Levine

Bibliographic record

VenueTeaching and Learning in Medicine · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInnovations in Medical Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurriculumAttendanceMedical educationAppealPsychologyMedicinePedagogyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 32nd Annual Meeting of the Association of Directors of Medical Student Education in Psychiatry (ADMSEP) was held June 22nd to June 24th 2006, in Annapolis, Maryland. Approximately 100 registrants from 80 medical schools were in attendance. Plenary sessions, workshops, and posters covered a wide range of educational topics, including issues of professionalism, the challenge of mentoring residents to become teachers, and analyses of psychiatric OSCE cases at various points in the curriculum. Dr. Geoffrey Norman, Canada Research Chair in Cognitive Dimensions of Clinical Expertise at McMaster University, offered the keynote address titled, “Beyond Problem-Based Learning.” In his talk, he argued that the concepts of problem-based learning (PBL) tend to be learned in unsystematic order, which makes it difficult for students to truly learn and understand new material. He suggested that successful transfer of concepts to new problems requires learning from multiple problems. In his talk, he outlined the new curriculum that is being advanced at McMaster (called the COMPASS Curriculum) based on these derived principles of learning and showed how it promised to be superior to “traditional” PBL. More information about the curriculum can be obtained from http://65.39.131.180/ContentPage.aspx?name=COMPASS%20 Home. The 11 abstracts in these proceedings were chosen for their general appeal to medical student educators and because they represent the educational research undertaken by ADMSEP members and colleagues. Included are two task force reports to illustrate the organization's efforts in meeting LCME requirements and a renewed attention to update resources for meeting clinical objectives. The ADMSEP Objectives Taskforce abstract reflects the interspecialty fertilization that underlies ACE. Also included are abstracts from a student study about doctor–patient boundaries and about webbased applications for facilitating administrative responsibilities to a survey of attitudes about who should teach about sexual dysfunction. To appreciate the breadth of topics covered at the meeting, the reader is referred to the full program on the “Meetings” pages of the ADMSEP Web site, http://www.admsep.org.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.290
Threshold uncertainty score0.970

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2900.139

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTeaching and Learning in MedicineSame topicInnovations in Medical EducationFrench-language works237,207