Analysis of sex-linked, sequence-characterized amplified region markers in <i>Salix eriocephala</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two DNA markers, sequence-characterized amplified region (SCAR) AE08780 and SCAR 354520, known to be linked to and flanking a putative sex determination locus in Salix viminalis L., were tested in another shrubform willow, Salix eriocephala Michx. Marker analysis of seven female and eight male S. eriocephala clones used to produce 34 fullsib families reveals that five pairs of parents are alternatively polymorphic relative to reciprocal male and female combinations for the two marker loci. A goodness-of-fit test of marker presence or absence and relationship to gender suggests that the occurrence of SCAR 354520 is not significantly different (χ2 = 3.18, df = 1, P > 0.05) from the expected ratio of marker presence:absence in the male and female progenies across all five families, indicating no relationship to gender. However, the occurrence of SCAR AE08780 differs significantly from expected (χ2 = 21.05, df = 1, P < 0.001) in the five families and seems to be linked to femaleness in S. eriocephala. Within a single family, 984 (n = 54), both markers show a significant deviation from expected at P < 0.01 (SCAR AE08780: χ2 = 11.37, df = 1; SCAR 354520: χ2 = 9.49, df = 1). These data support the hypothesis that there is an association between the markers and a locus associated with gender in two divergent species and that there may be a common sex determination mechanism in willow.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".