Sleep‐disordered breathing in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: A preliminary study of the role of portable monitoring
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is often associated with sleep disordered breathing (SDB), it is not standard clinical practice to routinely test this population for SDB, and the optimal timing and methodology for such testing has not been established. Our objectives were: 1) to examine the concordance between laboratory polysomnography (PSG) and two portable monitoring systems, and 2) to identify clinical factors associated with the onset of SDB. We performed a cross-sectional pilot study of patients with DMD who were 6 years of age or older, and who were registered at the Alberta Children's and Calgary General Hospitals. Patient symptom and functional rating scores were calculated, and pulmonary function tests, awake oxygen saturation, and capillary blood gases were obtained. PSG was performed according to standard methods, and results were compared with Snoresat(R) (Saga Tech Electronics, Inc.) and EdenTec(R) (Nellcor Puritan Bennett) portable home monitors. Eleven boys were studied. Ten of 11 subjects had normal awake oxygen saturation and capillary blood gases. Median forced vital capacity (FVC) was 70% of predicted values (15-104%). PSG identified 3 boys with severe hypoventilation occurring throughout REM sleep. Reported symptom severity did not predict the patients with significant SDB. All 3 boys with SDB had a severe functional disability and severely reduced FVCs. Portable monitoring in the home identified all patients with abnormal PSG. One additional patient was falsely identified by the EdenTec(R) monitor. We conclude that initial results using Snoresat(R) or EdenTec(R) monitoring equipment for the identification of SDB are promising, but further validation of portable home monitoring is required in this group of patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it