Childhood IgM Nephropathy: Comparison with Minimal Change Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The distinctiveness of IgM nephropathy (IgMN) as a clinicopathologic entity is controversial. Twenty-seven children (16 males, 11 females) with IgMN as defined immunohistochemically by diffuse mesangial staining of glomeruli for IgM were compared to a group of 63 children (40 males, 23 females) with minimal change disease (MCD). While mesangial expansion was significantly greater in IgMN than in MCD (p = 0.0014), there were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to the other biopsy factors. IgMN showed a significantly higher incidence of hypertension at presentation. More than 90% of patients in both groups presented with the nephrotic syndrome which in most initially responded to prednisone. Frequently relapsing/steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome was the most common indication for biopsy in both groups. Approximately 60% of patients from both groups received cytotoxic therapy. Eight percent of IgMN and 7% of MCD patients failed to respond to therapy. Relapse rates and mean dose of prednisone at relapse were very similar in both groups prior to biopsy. Relapse rates diminished significantly after treatment in the postbiopsy interval, but mean dose of prednisone at relapse did not change appreciably over time. None of the patients developed renal failure or hypertension in the follow-up period. At last visit 23% of IgMN and 27% of MCD had proteinuria. The results indicate that IgMN and MCD are indistinguishable clinically in children who are biopsied for the nephrotic syndrome.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".