Hypothalamic Dynamics of CD26 Protein in Obese and Fasted Rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background : Impaired control of brain functions by CD26 alterations and sensing of unbalanced metabolism could be related in obese and fasting rats. This study aims to search the hypothalamic regions targeted by the alterations of CD26 and cellular activity (Fos) in monosodium glutamate obese (MSG) and food deprived (FD) rats. Methods : The patterns of distribution of immunoreactivity (ir) of CD26 and Fos were quantified in the hypothalamus. Results : Compared to control, the CD26-ir increased in the supraoptic and retrochiasmatic nuclei of MSG. CD26-ir and Fos-ir concomitantly decreased in the dorsomedial and retrochiasmatic nuclei of MSG-FD, the paraventricular nucleus of MSG and MSG-FD and in the supraoptic nucleus of FD and MSG-FD, while they exhibited opposite changes in the retrochiasmatic nucleus of FD and MSG, the arcuate and periventricular nuclei of FD, MSG and MSG-FD, the paraventricular and dorsomedial nuclei of FD and the supraoptic nucleus of MSG. Conclusions : The data provide clear evidences for regional specific alterations of CD26 together with altered cellular activity in the hypothalamus of MSG and FD animals and demonstrate that regulation of CD26 is a hallmark of hypothalamic exposure to metabolic challenges. d oi:10.4021/jem24w
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".