MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054255883 · doi:10.1142/s0219467805001859

SCCI-HYBRID METHODS FOR 2D CURVE TRACING

2005· article· en· W2054255883 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Image and Graphics · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Numerical Analysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContinuationIterated functionFunction (biology)MathematicsInterval (graph theory)Interval arithmeticCurve fittingJacobian curveTripling-oriented Doche–Icart–Kohel curveSubdivisionComputationApplied mathematicsComputer scienceAlgorithmMathematical optimizationMathematical analysisElliptic curveStatisticsCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A hybrid method for plotting 2-dimensional curves, defined implicitly by equations of the form f(x,y) = 0 is presented. The method is extremely robust and reliable and consists of Space Covering techniques, Continuation principles and Interval analysis (i.e. SCCI). The space covering, based on iterated subdivision, guarantees that no curve branches or isolated curve parts or even points are lost (which can happen if grid methods are used). The continuation method is initiated in a subarea as soon as it is proven that the subarea contains only one smooth curve. Such a subarea does not need to be subdivided further so that the computation is accelerated as far as possible with respect to the subdivision process. The novelty of the SCCI-hybrid method is the intense use of the implicit function theorem for controlling the steps of the method. Although the implicit function theorem has a rather local nature, it is empowered with global properties by evaluating it in an interval environment. This means that the theorem can provide global information about the curve in a subarea such as existence, non-existence, uniqueness of the curve or even the presence of singular points. The information gained allows the above-mentioned control of the subarea and the decision of its further processing, i.e. deleting it, subdividing it, switching to the continuation method or preparing the plotting of the curve in this subarea. The curves can be processed mathematically in such a manner, that the derivation of the plotted curve from the exact curve is as small as desired (modulo the screen resolution).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.943
Threshold uncertainty score0.293

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it