Structural Variations in a Single Hyaluronan Derivative Significantly Alter Wound‐Healing Effects in the Rabbit Maxillary Sinus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Biomaterials based on hyaluronan (HA) are currently used after sinus surgery but have not been found to decrease scarring or enhance wound healing. Chemical composition of these modified HA molecules may impact their biological and clinical effects. OBJECTIVE: To analyze chemical variations of a single crosslinked HA-based hydrogel, chemically modified thiolated HA (CMHA-SX). METHODS: Four different components of the hydrogel composition were altered, yielding 54 variations. These were subjected to biomechanical testing, and then potential clinically relevant variations were further tested for swelling and degradation characteristics. Using a rabbit maxillary sinus model, the ability of the material variations to stent a neo-ostium was tested. Histologic measures were also assessed. Biomechanical and biological effects were correlated. RESULTS: Minor compositional changes had profound biomechanical and biological effects. Swelling and rate of enzymatic degradation were closely related. CMHA-SX hydrogels that were the most effective stents in maintaining the neo-ostium also generated the lowest level of acute inflammation, as determined by histology. CONCLUSIONS: Chemical composition has a significant impact on the clinical potential of modified HA materials. Histocompatibility appears to most significantly affect ostium preservation. SIGNIFICANCE: Different CMHA-SX hydrogels perform differently in vivo, even when the chemical compositions are quite similar. Objective prospective testing of modified HA materials should precede their clinical use in sinus surgery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".