Local Limit Load Analytical Model for Thick-Walled Pipe With Axial Surface Defect
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Based on the previous limit load analytical modeling for cracked thin-walled pipe (Orynyak, I. V., 2006, “Leak and Break Models of Pressurized Pipe With Axial Defects,” Proceedings of the 6th International Pipeline Conference (IPC), Calgary, Alberta, Canada, Paper No. IPC2006-10066, pp. 41–56), the limit load model for thick-walled pipe had developed. There are some additional peculiarities included in the proposed model. First, the distribution of radial stresses is taken into consideration in the limit state formulation using Tresca's criterion. Second, related to the crack location and interaction of hoop stresses (due to the inner pressure) and axial ones (caused by local bending moment) have been assessed in the limit state. Third, hoop stresses redistribution with possibility of plastic hinge formation in zone opposite to the crack is taken into account. Finally, the proposed easy to use analytical formulas have been verified by comparing with full-scale burst tests.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it