MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054354013 · doi:10.1002/pros.20455

An androgen-independent androgen receptor function protects from inositol hexakisphosphate toxicity in the PC3/PC3(AR) prostate cancer cell lines

2006· article· en· W2054354013 on OpenAlexafffund
Jean‐Simon Diallo, Benjamin Péant, Laurent Lessard, Nathalie Delvoye, Cécile Le Page, Anne‐Marie Mes‐Masson, Fred Saad

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Prostate · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPhytase and its Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
FundersCanadian Urological Oncology GroupAstraZeneca
KeywordsAndrogen receptorDownregulation and upregulationProstate cancerAndrogenEndocrinologyCancer researchCell cultureInternal medicineReceptorInositolBiologyApoptosisChemistryCancerMedicineBiochemistryGeneHormoneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Inositol hexakisphosphate (IP6) is a phytochemical exhibiting anticancer activity. Because few prostate cancer (PCa) cell lines have been used to study IP6, we assessed its efficacy in a panel of PCa cell lines. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using WST-1 assays we observed that, although androgens did not modulate its efficacy, IP6 was more active in androgen receptor (AR) negative cells than in AR-positive cells. Stable expression of the AR in PC3 cells (PC3(AR)) decreased the response to IP6, which was reversed by an AR-targeting siRNA. Furthermore, AR expression in PC3 cells resulted in significantly reduced caspase-3 activation (P < 0.001) and DNA fragmentation (P < 0.05) in response to IP6. Similarly, although treatment with IP6 caused the upregulation of NF-kappaB-responsive (IkappaB-alpha, IRF-2) and p53/E2F-responsive genes (Puma, Noxa) in PC3 cells, this increase was reduced in PC3AR cells (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: We conclude that resistance to IP6 can be linked to a ligand-independent AR function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.229
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe ProstateSame topicPhytase and its ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207