Fate of Five Celiac Disease-Associated Antibodies During Normal Diet in Genetically At-Risk Children Observed from Birth in a Natural History Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To explore the natural history of antibodies against tissue transglutaminase (TGA), endomysium (EMA), reticulin (ARA), and gliadin (AGA-IgG and AGA-IgA) in children carrying HLA-conferred risk for celiac disease (CD) and observed frequently from birth. METHODS: TGA was measured in serum samples obtained between years 2000 and 2003 from 1,320 children carrying genetic CD risk. If a sample was TGA positive, all five antibodies were analyzed in all banked and forthcoming samples from that child, and a duodenal biopsy was recommended. At the end of this observation, in August 2004, the age of the children was from 1 to 9.5 yr (mean 4.1 yr). RESULTS: Forty-nine children (3.7%) were TGA positive. In these children, AGA-IgG had emerged at the mean age (+/- SD, range) of 2.0 +/- 1.5, 0.5-6.6 yr, while TGA, EMA, and ARA all emerged concurrently somewhat later (TGA at 3.2 +/- 1.5, 1.0-7.0 yr, P < 0.001 when compared to AGA-IgG). Despite continuing gluten exposure, positive TGA, EMA, ARA, AGA-IgA, and AGA-IgG values were spontaneously lost in 49%, 45%, 43%, 41%, and 32% of the children, respectively. CD was diagnosed by biopsy in 20 of the 26 TGA-positive children who consented to a biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: Potential CD trigger(s) other than only gluten probably function before AGA-IgG emerges, i.e., > or =3 months earlier than the transglutaminase-associated antibodies appear. In a remarkable proportion of the children, antibodies disappear spontaneously suggesting that regulatory immune phenomena under favorable circumstances are able to extinguish incipient CD in genetically at-risk children even without exclusion of gluten from the diet.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".