5,10-Methenyltetrahydrofolate cyclohydrolase, rat liver and chemically catalysed formation of 5-formyltetrahydrofolate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The 5,10-methenyltetrahydrofolate (5,10-CH=H4folate) synthetase catalyses the physiologically irreversible formation of 5,10-CH=H4folate from 5-formyltetrahydrofolate (5-HCO-H4folate) and ATP. It is not clear how (or if) 5-HCO-H4folate is formed in vivo. Using a spectrophotometric assay for 5-HCO-H4folate, human recombinant 5,10-CH=H4folate cyclohydrolase, which catalyses the hydrolysis of 5,10-CH=H4folate to 10-HCO-H4folate, was previously shown to catalyse inefficiently the formation of 5-HCO-H4folate at pH 7.3 [Pelletier and MacKenzie (1996) Bioorg. Chem. 24, 220-228]. In the present study, we report that (i) the human cyclohydrolase enzyme catalyses the conversion of 10-HCO-/5,10-CH=H4folate into 5-HCO-H4folate (it is also chemically formed) at pH 4.0-7.0; (ii) rat liver has a very low capacity to catalyse the formation of 5-HCO-H4folate when compared with the traditional activity of 5,10-CH=H4folate cyclohydrolase and the activity of the 5,10-CH=H4folate synthetase; and (iii) a substantial amount of 5-HCO-H4folate reported to be present in rat liver is chemically formed during analytical procedures. We conclude that (i) the cyclohydrolase represents some of the capacity of rat liver to catalyse the formation of 5-HCO-H4folate; (ii) the amount of 5-HCO-H4folate reported to be present in rat liver is overestimated (liver 5-HCO-H4folate content may be negligible); and (iii) there is little evidence that 5-HCO-H4folate inhibits one-carbon metabolism in mammals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".