MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Wake Synchronization for a Pair of Staggered Cylinders in Cross-Flow with the Upstream Cylinder in Transverse Oscillation

2010· article· en· W2054446331 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEngineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWakeCylinderTransverse planeOscillation (cell signaling)Reynolds numberPhysicsMechanicsUpstream (networking)Kármán vortex streetFlow (mathematics)Vortex sheddingVortexAmplitudeSynchronization (alternating current)Flow visualizationGeometryOpticsMathematicsTurbulenceEngineeringStructural engineeringTopology (electrical circuits)TelecommunicationsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Numerical simulations are presented for the cross-flow over two staggered circular cylinders in the low subcritical Reynolds number regime with Re=1500, with the upstream of the two cylinders subject to a transverse harmonic oscillation. A vortex method is implemented for the solution of the unsteady two-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations. The effect of varying the frequency of oscillation of the upstream cylinder, with fixed amplitude of oscillation, is investigated. The numerical flow visualization results reveal a synchronization of the wake structure with the oscillating cylinder for different ranges of the excitation frequency. Four distinct synchronization modes are identified, and are compared with available experimental data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.781
Threshold uncertainty score0.486

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it