MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054468289 · doi:10.3171/jns/2008/108/01/0105

Length of tumor–cochlear nerve contact and hearing outcome after surgery for vestibular schwannoma

2008· article· en· W2054468289 on OpenAlexaff
Raymund L. Yong, Brian D. Westerberg, Charles Dong, Ryojo Akagami

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of neurosurgery · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMeningioma and schwannoma management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSchwannomaMedicineVestibular systemCochlear nerveAcoustic neuromaNeurosurgeryOtorhinolaryngologyAudiologyVestibular nerveHearing lossInternal auditory meatusMagnetic resonance imagingFacial nerveSurgeryRadiologyCochlea

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: Tumor size is likely to be a major determinant of hearing preservation after surgery for vestibular schwannoma. Findings in some large case series have not supported this concept, possibly due to variation in the technique used for tumor measurement. The authors sought to determine if the length of tumor-cochlear nerve contact was predictive of hearing outcome in adults undergoing resection of a vestibular schwannoma. METHODS: Patients who underwent a hearing-preserving approach for resection of a vestibular schwannoma at one institution by a neurosurgeon/neurotologist team between 2001 and 2005 were screened. Patients with American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) Class A or B hearing preoperatively were included. Magnetic resonance images were reviewed and used to calculate the length of tumor-cochlear nerve contact. Tumors were also measured according to AAO-HNS guidelines. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were included, 8 (26%) of whom had hearing preservation. Univariate analysis revealed that extracanalicular length of tumor-cochlear nerve contact (p = 0.0365), preoperative hearing class (p = 0.028), I-V interpeak latency of the brainstem auditory evoked potential (p = 0.021), and the interaural I-V interpeak latency difference (p = 0.018) were predictive of hearing outcome. Multivariate analysis confirmed the predictive value of extra-canalicular length of contact and preoperative hearing class (p = 0.041 and p = 0.0235, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Vestibular schwannomas with greater lengths of tumor-cochlear nerve contact increase a patient's risk for hearing loss after surgery with attempted hearing preservation. Involvement of the internal auditory canal produces a constant risk of hearing loss. Data from the experience of a single surgical team can be used to estimate the probability of good hearing outcome for any given patient with serviceable hearing and a vestibular schwannoma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of neurosurgerySame topicMeningioma and schwannoma managementFrench-language works237,207