Methylmercury in Mosquitoes Related to Atmospheric Mercury Deposition and Contamination
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A connection between loadings of inorganic Hg, especially from the atmosphere, and accumulation of methylmercury (MeHg) in aquatic biota has not been firmly established. Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) may be a useful indictor of Hg contamination or MeHg accumulation in aquatic ecosystems because they have aquatic life stages, and their ubiquitous distribution permits sampling across wide ranges of climate, biological productivity, and atmospheric Hg deposition. We examined MeHg in adult mosquitoes from subtropical (Florida), maritime (California), continental (Michigan), and arctic (Alaska) regions of North America that span a range in wet atmospheric Hg deposition (1.5-15 microg m(-2) y(-1)). More than 90% of the Hg in mosquitoes was MeHg, and concentrations varied among locations. Levels of MeHg differed among mosquito species at six sites in northwest Florida (Ochlerotatus atlanticus < Culex nigripalpus < Anopheles crucians); this may be related to differences in biogeochemical characteristics of the aquatic habitat that affect dietary accumulation of MeHg during the larval stage. Mosquito MeHg was related positively to wet atmospheric Hg deposition among locations where atmospheric deposition is the principal source of Hg, and it was greatly enhanced in Hg-polluted environs near the Sulphur Bank Mine in Lake County, California. These results suggest that MeHg in mosquitoes may be a useful and sensitive indicator of Hg loadings to aquatic systems, including that derived from atmospheric deposition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".