MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Genome stability of <i>vtc1</i>, <i>tt4</i>, and <i>tt5 Arabidopsis thaliana</i> mutants impaired in protection against oxidative stress

2004· article· en· W2054559487 on OpenAlexafffund
Jody Filkowski, Olga Kovalchuk, Igor Kovalchuk

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Plant Journal · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPhotosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Lethbridge
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsReactive oxygen speciesOxidative stressArabidopsis thalianaRadicalDNA damageMutantBiologyDNA repairGeneDNABiochemistryCell biologyArabidopsisChemistryGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are formed upon normal cellular metabolism or influence of environmental factors and, at normal levels, they play an important physiological role. However, at elevated levels, radicals are toxic and extremely dangerous to all cellular components, including DNA. To efficiently protect themselves, plants have developed sophisticated mechanisms for radical screening and scavenging. In this paper, we analyzed the genome stability of several plant mutants impaired in the protection against free radicals. We crossed the well-known uidA recombination reporter line 651 to flavonoid (tt4 and tt5) and Vitamin C (vtc1)-deficient plants. We found that in all lines tested, both spontaneous and induced (UVC and Rose Bengal (RB)) recombination was higher than in the original 651 parental line. The mRNA expression levels of various DNA repair (RAD1, RAD54-like, MSH3) as well as radical scavenging genes (GPx1, CAT, FSD3) exhibited substantial differences in both control and induced conditions. Our data show that plants impaired in certain aspects of the protection against elevated levels of free radicals induce the production of scavenging enzymes earlier than wild-type (wt) plants, and the higher level of radical species results in the increased incidence of spontaneous double-strand breaks resulting in a higher expression of DNA repair genes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.400

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations72
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Plant JournalSame topicPhotosynthetic Processes and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207