MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Sustained low‐efficiency dialysis with filtration (SLEDD‐f) in the management of acute sodium valproate intoxication

2008· article· en· W2054614998 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Emon Khan, Paul Huggan, Leo Anthony Celi, Robert MacGinley, John Schollum, Robert Walker

Bibliographic record

VenueHemodialysis International · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineValproic AcidDialysisHemodialysisDrugPharmacokineticsDrug overdoseDiafiltrationPharmacologyDosingPharmacodynamicsIntensive care medicineAnesthesiaPoison controlInternal medicineEmergency medicineChemistryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hemodialysis is only infrequently used in drug overdosage situations. The efficacy of hemodialysis to remove the drug depends upon the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the drug. At normal therapeutic concentrations, valproic acid is predominantly protein bound and therefore removal by hemodialysis is limited. In an overdose situation, protein binding is rapidly saturated and therefore the substantially larger quantities of the free drug can rapidly cause toxicity. Slow low-efficient daily diafiltration (SLEDD) has not previously been utilized in a drug overdose situation. We report the effective use of SLEDD to remove high toxic concentrations of valproic acid in an overdose situation. Slow low-efficient daily diafiltration also prevented the rebound phenomenon that can occur as the excess drug is released from its protein-bound stores. Hybrid dialysis therapies deserve further evaluation in the management of other poisonings where extra-corporeal therapy is indicated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.000
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHemodialysis InternationalSame topicPharmacological Effects and Toxicity StudiesFrench-language works237,207