MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2054653709 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2012-5480

Abstract 5480: Consumption of Lake Ontario sport fish and the incidence of melanoma in the New York State Angler Cohort Study (NYSACS)

2012· article· en· W2054653709 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Joseph W. Green, Mya Swanson, James R. Olson, Matthew R. Bonner

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCarcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCohortPoisson regressionDemographyConfoundingIncidence (geometry)Cohort studyEnvironmental healthConfidence intervalGerontologyPopulationInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and other persistent organic pollutants (e.g., toxaphene) has been linked to an increased risk for melanoma in occupational settings. Great Lakes fish bioaccumulate PCBs and organochlorine pesticides, thus consumption is thought to be an important non-occupational exposure route. We investigated the consumption of sport-caught fish from Lake Ontario and the incidence of melanoma in the New York State Angler Cohort Study (NYSACS), a prospective cohort of 17,097 anglers and their spouses aged 18 to 40 years old at enrollment. Participants completed a mailed self-administered questionnaire upon enrollment in 1991. The questionnaire queried for the number of years that fish from L. Ontario were consumed, frequency of species specific fish consumption as well as demographic factors, smoking history and other selected potential confounders. As of December 31, 2008, fifty-one histologically confirmed, first primary, incident melanoma cases were identified via the New York State Cancer Registry. Vital status was determined by linkage with the Social Security Administration Death file. Prevalent cancer cases (n = 196) were excluded. Of the remaining 16,901cohort members, 10% (n=1,672) were lost to follow-up and censored in the year they left New York State. Analyses were restricted to Caucasians (n= 16,326). Fish consumption was dichotomized into never vs. ever. Duration of consumption was categorized into tertiles based on the distribution among the cases reporting eating Lake Ontario sport-caught fish. Poisson regression was used to calculate rate ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals, adjusting for age, income, years of education and number of years fishing in New York State. Lake Ontario sport-caught fish consumption was weakly associated with melanoma risk RR=1.33(0.6-2.99) as compared with non-consumers. Duration of Lake Ontario fish consumption was not convincingly associated with melanoma incidence (non-eaters RR = 1.0 (ref); 1st tertile RR = 1.07 (95% CI = 0.38-3.06); 2nd tertile RR = 1.41 (95% CI = 0.49-4.03); 3rd tertile RR = 2.16 (95% CI = 0.79-5.89); p-for trend =0.10. Although interpretation of our preliminary results is complicated by a small number of cases (n=52) and inability to control for potential confounding from sun exposure, they suggest that consumption of Great Lakes fish contaminated with PCBs and other organochlorine compounds was not associated with incidence of melanoma. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 5480. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-5480

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.437
Threshold uncertainty score0.869

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicCarcinogens and Genotoxicity AssessmentFrench-language works237,207