Protein‐precipitating capacity of crude condensed tannins of canola and rapeseed hulls
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The protein‐precipitating potentials (PPP) of soluble condensed tannins (SCT) were determined in hulls from several samples of canola and rapeseed varieties. The PPP were expressed as slopes of lines (titration curves) reflecting the amount of SCT‐protein precipitated vs. the amount of SCT added to the reaction mixture. The slopes (Sp) of titration curves obtained using the protein‐precipitation assay ranged from 2.96 to 10.91 (absorbance units at 510 nm per mg SCT), and those of titration curves, obtained using the dye‐labeled bovine serum albumin (BSA) assay (Sd), ranged from 28.1 to 267 (% precipitated BSA per mg SCT). For both assays, a statistically significant (P≤0.001) semilogarithmic linear correlation existed between the slopes and the SCT contents in the canola and rapeseed hulls. Higher amounts of SCT‐protein complexes were precipitated at 40°C than at room temperature. Determination of titration curves under standardized conditions (type and concentration of protein, pH and temperature) afforded meaningful differences in the slopes among the range of SCT extracts from canola and rapeseed hulls used in this study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".