Integrated Formation Evaluation for Cretaceous Carbonate Khasib II of AD Oilfield, Iraq
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract AD oilfield is located in the southeast of Iraq and structurally it is a long axis gentle anticline in Mesoptamian foredeep. This oilfield is in the development planning stage. The accurate formation evaluation plays an important role in making development strategy. In this paper, integrated evaluations of major target formation, Cretaceous carbonate Khasib II were introduced with the combinations of available data. Khasib II was mainly deposited within marine carbonate platform shoals and distributed stably in the full field with an average thickness of 40m. Based on the core data, four rock types are defined. Upwards lithology varies from planktonic foram micritc wackestone through green algae packstone to bioclastic and calcarenite grainstone. The porosities are almost same, about 25% while permeability varies in a large range for different lithology. Lower Khasib II planktonic foram limestone has no more than 1mD in permeability and no higher than 1ohm.m in resistivity while Upper Khasib II limestones have 10mD in average permeability and high resistivity. Reservoir spaces are mainly pores and vugs while fractures are not developed. Pore types are mainly intragranular pores, intergranular pores and intercrystal pores. Two throat types, the tubular throat and the lamellar throat are identified which are the major control factors for leading to the difference of permeability in lower and upper Khasib II. Test results show that lower planktonic foram limestone is dry and upper limestones produce oil which can be inferred that the low resistivity for lower Khasib II is resulted from the lithology rather than water. Reservoir distribution, petrophysical properties and fluid distribution for upper Khasib II are analyzed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".